Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/1120
Title: Ambiguities and Inconsistencies in Relation to the Obligations of Proxies under Corporations Law: A Model for Reform
Contributor(s): McConvill, J (author); Bagaric, M (author)
Publication Date: 2004
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1120
Abstract: This article reconsiders the important question which came to light as a result of the controversial 2002 Coles Myer annual general meeting: do directors that are appointed as proxy have an obligation to vote as directed (and indeed should they)? A recent decision of the New South Wales Supreme Court, which was subsequently approved on appeal, stands for the proposition that proxy holders are agents of the shareholders that appointed them. However, currently the Corporations Act only requires a Chairman appointed as proxy to vote as directed — not an ordinary director. This article briefly explains the present state of the law in Australia on this issue, and then explores some interesting recent judicial remarks which may suggest that ordinary directors appointed as proxy must vote as directed in order to satisfy their director's duties (both common law and statutory) to the company. We finally outline a proposed statutory reform initiative which seeks to remove the present uncertainty in the law by introducing a blanket requirement that all proxy holders must vote as directed.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: University of New England Law Journal, 1(1), p. 109-133
Publisher: University of New England
Place of Publication: Armidale, Australia
ISSN: 1449-2199
HERDC Category Description: C2 Non-Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Other Links: http://tlc.une.edu.au/lawjournal/index.php?action=showarticle&articleid=4&journalid=8
http://tlc.une.edu.au/lawjournal/
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 140
Views: 136
Downloads: 4
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
5 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE02.pdfPublisher version (open access)126.56 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

104
checked on Mar 3, 2019

Download(s)

10
checked on Mar 3, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.