Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/1218
Title: Report cards, informed consent and market forces
Contributor(s): Walsh, Adrian John (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2007
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1218
Abstract: What ethical ramifications might the commercial context of much modern medicine have for the report card movement? We live in a world in which medicine in general is increasingly subject to market forces; not only are more and more goods and services commodified, and hence able to be procured on the open market, but within the public sphere, market-like accountability processes are increasingly set in place. We need to consider what implications this social context might have for the ethical status of report cards. perhaps what is morally permissible in the context of public provision might transmogrify into the morally pernicious in a commercial environment. What difference, if any, might market forces make?
Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source of Publication: Informed Consent and Clinician Accountability: The Ethics of Report Cards on Surgeon Performance, p. 180-191
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Place of Publication: Cambridge, England
ISBN: 9780521687782
0521865077
9780521865074
0521687780
Field of Research (FOR): 220199 Applied Ethics not elsewhere classified
HERDC Category Description: B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book
Other Links: http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521687782
http://books.google.com/books?id=jE-66dYXQ-YC
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 112
Views: 116
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

60
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.