Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Report cards, informed consent and market forces||Contributor(s):||Walsh, Adrian John (author)||Publication Date:||2007||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1218||Abstract:||What ethical ramifications might the commercial context of much modern medicine have for the report card movement? We live in a world in which medicine in general is increasingly subject to market forces; not only are more and more goods and services commodified, and hence able to be procured on the open market, but within the public sphere, market-like accountability processes are increasingly set in place. We need to consider what implications this social context might have for the ethical status of report cards. perhaps what is morally permissible in the context of public provision might transmogrify into the morally pernicious in a commercial environment. What difference, if any, might market forces make?||Publication Type:||Book Chapter||Source of Publication:||Informed Consent and Clinician Accountability: The Ethics of Report Cards on Surgeon Performance, p. 180-191||Publisher:||Cambridge University Press||Place of Publication:||Cambridge, England||ISBN:||9780521687782
|Field of Research (FOR):||220199 Applied Ethics not elsewhere classified||HERDC Category Description:||B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book||Other Links:||http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521687782
|Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 112
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapter|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.