Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/1314
Title: Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students' Classroom Learning
Contributor(s): Marschark, M (author); Leigh, G (author); Sapere, P (author); Burnham, D (author); Convertino, C (author); Stinson, M (author); Knoors, H (author); Verloed, MPJ (author); Noble, William Glass (author)
Publication Date: 2006
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl013
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1314
Abstract: Four experiments examined the utility of real-time text in supporting deaf students' learning from lectures in postsecondary (Experiments 1 and 2) and secondary classrooms (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 1 compared the effects on learning of sign language interpreting, real-time text (C-Print), and both. Real-time text alone led to significantly higher performance by deaf students than the other two conditions, but performance by deaf students in all conditions was significantly below that of hearing peers who saw lectures without any support services. Experiment 2 compared interpreting and two forms of real-time text, C-Print and Communication Access Real-Time Translation, at immediate testing and after a 1-week delay (with study notes). No significant differences among support services were obtained at either testing. Experiment 3 also failed to reveal significant effects at immediate or delayed testing in a comparison of real-time text, direct (signed) instruction, and both. Experiment 4 found no significant differences between interpreting and interpreting plus real-time text on the learning of either new words or the content of television programs. Alternative accounts of the observed pattern of results are considered, but it is concluded that neither sign language interpreting nor real-time text have any inherent, generalized advantage over the other in supporting deaf students in secondary or postsecondary settings. Providing deaf students with both services simultaneously does not appear to provide any generalized benefit, at least for the kinds of materials utilized here.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(4), p. 421-437
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Place of Publication: United States
ISSN: 1081-4159
Field of Research (FOR): 170112 Sensory Processes, Perception and Performance
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 165
Views: 162
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
4 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

45
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

74
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.