Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/1379
Title: Comment on ''U-Pb calcite age of the Late Permian Castile Formation, Delaware Basin: A constraint on the age of the Permian-Triassic boundary (?)'' by M.L. Becker et al. [Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 203 (2002) 681-689]
Contributor(s): Metcalfe, Ian  (author)
Publication Date: 2004
DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00603-4
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1379
Abstract: Becker et al. in their recent paper have proposed a U-Pb calcite age of 251.5±2.8 Ma for the Castile Formation of the Delaware Basin, and infer that the age of the Permian-Triassic boundary should be younger than this age. In addition, Becker et al. imply that U-Pb ages on organic-rich calcite are more accurate than combined U-Pb zircon and Ar/Ar sanidine/biotite ages from volcanic ash falls. I here challenge the accuracy of the Castile Formation calcite age, and in particular, the proposed constraint on the age of the Permian-Triassic boundary.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 217(3-4), p. 465-468
Publisher: Pergamon
Place of Publication: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
ISSN: 1385-013X
0012-821X
Field of Research (FOR): 040303 Geochronology
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Other Links: http://www-personal.une.edu.au/~imetcal2/EPSL2004.pdf
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 69
Views: 70
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.