Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Historians and moral disgust||Contributor(s):||Atkinson, Alan Thomas (author)||Publication Date:||2003||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1447||Abstract:||The three articles by Keith Windschuttle published in 'Quadrant' late in 2000 aim to revise, in a fundamental way, our understanding of frontier conflict in Australia. This revisionist approach is partly shaped by a distinctive view of history as a whole and is seems to involve the indiscriminate rejection of methodological advances over the last 30 years. In a period when we have been struggling to make historical method stretch to comprehend the real diversity of human faith and understanding and the spiritual depth of human experience, and at the same time communicate those issues to the world at large, the revisionist approach seems to lead in the opposite direction. This amounts to a failure of genuine, energetic curiosity and a failure of imagination, both of which are fundamental to good scholarship. Most of what revisionist critics such as Windschuttle have argued so far in their account of frontier violence is informed by these failures.||Publication Type:||Book Chapter||Source of Publication:||Frontier Conflict: The Australian Experience, p. 113-119||Publisher:||National Museum of Australia||Place of Publication:||Canberra||ISBN:||1876944110||Field of Research (FOR):||210303 Australian History (excl Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander History)||HERDC Category Description:||B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book||Other Links:||http://www.nma.gov.au/about_us/publications/frontier_conflict/
|Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 69
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapter|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 4, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.