Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Judicial Performance Evaluation, Promotion and Salary Packaging||Contributor(s):||Colbran, Stephen (author)||Publication Date:||2002||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1448||Abstract:||For many judges, judicial performance evaluation is a fearsome prospect - one hell bent on undermining judicial independence and centuries of legal tradition. Others take a more liberal view and see the potential for performance evaluation as a useful tool for professional self development. These contrasting views are based on different perceptions of what the concept of judicial performance evaluation may involve.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||The Judicial Review: selected papers, 5(4), p. 335-357||Publisher:||Judicial Commission of New South Wales||Place of Publication:||Australia||ISSN:||1038-8559||Field of Research (FOR):||180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Other Links:||http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=20021948;res=AGISPT
|Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 135
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 4, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.