Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/1525
Title: Epistemic Bootstrapping
Contributor(s): Forrest, Peter (author)
Publication Date: 2006
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1525
Abstract: This paper concerns the connection between internalist justification and externalist warrant, with the aim of defending what might seem a blatantly circular way of reasoning. Because herds of thirsty pistemologists have muddied the waters I shall not, however, assume any fixed meanings for terms like "justification" and "warrant". I shall not even assume that William Alston (2005) is being unduly defeatist in giving up on the concept of justification, as in his recent work. Instead I shall examine two examples, leaving it to readers to generalise as they see fit. Some preliminary remarks are in order, however, concerning what I mean by the phrases "internalist justification" and "externalist warrant".
Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source of Publication: Aspects of Knowing: Epistemological Essays, p. 53-66
Publisher: Elsevier
Place of Publication: Amsterdam
ISBN: 0080449794
9780080449791
Field of Research (FOR): 220399 Philosophy not elsewhere classified
HERDC Category Description: B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book
Other Links: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=LUWW4lrWesgC&pg=PA53
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/20102237
Series Name: Perspectives on Cognitive Science
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 40
Views: 40
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Mar 4, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.