Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Legal Liability as a Criterion for Judicial Performance Evaluation||Contributor(s):||Colbran, Stephen (author)||Publication Date:||2003||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1700||Abstract:||In Australia the debate concerning legal ability has been focussed onjudicial appointment not performance evaluation of those in office.Despite this limitation the points raised concerning appointment aredirectly relevant to performance evaluation. Judges control the courtroom. Judges interpret, apply rules of evidence and procedure and directly and indirectly affect the way in which barristers present their cases. Chief Justice de Jersey, of the Supreme Courtof Queensland, argues, they must have "high intellect and legal learning", the "capacity to analyse and articulate facts and legal propositions clearly", and "experience in and knowledge of the way litigation is conducted." This may be classified as judicial competence.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||The Newcastle Law Review, 7(1), p. 15-34||Publisher:||University of Newcastle, Faculty of Law||Place of Publication:||Newcastle, Australia||ISSN:||1324-8758||Field of Research (FOR):||180199 Law not elsewhere classified||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Other Links:||http://www.newcastle.edu.au/school/law/students/newcastle-law-review.html
|Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 48
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 3, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.