Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Management Skills as a Criterion for Judicial Performance Evaluation||Contributor(s):||Colbran, Stephen (author)||Publication Date:||2002||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1755||Abstract:||This article proposes two measures of judicial management skills,which may be used in an Australian pilot programme for judicialperformance evaluation. The measures are evaluated by a nationalsurvey of barristers' management skill ratings of Supreme and FederalCourt judges. Barristers who responded to the survey instrumentthought the proposed measures of judicial management skills wereimportant measures of judicial performance. The measures have a highlevel of internal consistency.The article also examines aspects of judicial management skills as ameasure of judicial performance. These aspects include identifyingmeasures of judicial management skills; whether judicial managementskills differ between trial and appellate judges; whether judicialgender affects management skills; whether judicial management skillsdeteriorate with age or experience; and whether older judges treatjunior barristers differently.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||University of Western Sydney Law Review, v.6, p. 191-208||Publisher:||University of Western Sydney, School of Law (Campbelltown Campus)||Place of Publication:||Sydney||ISSN:||1446-9294||Field of Research (FOR):||180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Other Links:||http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UWSLRev/2002/8.html
|Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 60
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 4, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.