Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Vagueness, supertranslatability, and conceptual schemes
Contributor(s): Blinov, Arcady Leonidovich  (author)
Publication Date: 2007
Handle Link:
Abstract: A case is developed against Donald Davidson's thesis that any attempt to give meaning to the idea of conceptual relativism is doomed. Even under Davidson's assumption that untranslatability is a necessary condition of a difference between two schemes, it appears to be possible to conceive a situation in which one language is untranslatable for another, but still accessible for truth testing, which undermines Davidson's main argument. One further argument of Davidson's is countered by the observation that even if we play the game of radical interpretation strictly on Davidson's terms, we may well encounter a situation in which the only rational choice is to allow for partial failures of translation, and thus for a difference between the two conceptual schemes.
Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source of Publication: Mental States: Volume 1: Evolution, function, nature, v.1, p. 233-246
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Place of Publication: Philadelphia, USA
ISBN: 9789027231024
Field of Research (FOR): 220313 Philosophy of Language
HERDC Category Description: B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book
Other Links:
Series Name: Studies in language companion series
Series Number : 92
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 161
Views: 162
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Mar 9, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.