Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Paying the piper: A critical examination of ACIL Allen's (2016) An Economic Assessment of Recasting Council Boundaries in South Australia||Contributor(s):||Dollery, Brian E (author); Drew, Joseph (author)||Publication Date:||2017||DOI:||10.1016/j.eap.2017.02.003||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23140||Abstract:||Contemporary public policymaking relies on commissioned work from for-profit consulting companies as a prime source of policy advice. The scholarly literature on the 'externalisation' of policy advice has questioned the analytical rigour of such externalised advice. An embryonic literature on policy externalisation in Australian local government has demonstrated that serious flaws exist in numerous consultant reports. In an effort to contribute to this nascent body of empirical scholarship, this paper critically examines ACIL Allen's (2016) An Economic Assessment of Recasting Council Boundaries in South Australia which prescribes the wholesale amalgamation of South Australian local councils. We show that ACIL Allen (2016) is seriously flawed and its policy prescriptions should thus be treated with caution.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Economic Analysis and Policy, v.54, p. 74-82||Publisher:||Economic Society of Australia Inc||Place of Publication:||Australia||ISSN:||0313-5926||Field of Research (FOR):||160509 Public Administration||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 3
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
checked on Nov 30, 2018
checked on Mar 7, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.