Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/2388
Title: Seeding the gap: An investigation into competency-based training at the edge of chaos
Contributor(s): Rutherford, Phillip David (author); Gerber, Rod (supervisor); Smith, Larry (supervisor)
Conferred Date: 2007
Copyright Date: 2005
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2388
Abstract: This research study investigates the impact that the complexity theories have on the way in which competency-based training is designed and implemented in Australia. The aim of this study was to define, understand, map and analyse the experiences of individuals who have participated in a competency-based training program for the position that they held at the time of the research. To achieve this, a review was conducted of contemporary theories and research carried out in fields related to vocational education and training, the management of knowledge and learning in the workplace, modern business practices, and of new ways of thinking about complex organisational and human systems. An ethnographic-inductive case study was conducted with the participation of staff employed in three work environments, each different in its own ways but all characterised as complex and at times chaotic. It was built around a multi-method research approach in which interviews, observation and focus groups were used to gather and validate data concerning the phenomenon of skills and knowledge applied in such environments. Thematic analysis techniques were then used to collate, analyse and make sense of this data. The outcome of this was a new way of understanding the work environment for which competency-based training systems are designed and a questioning of the current approach to vocational training and the assumptions and definitions upon which it is based. This research study concluded that while the principles and processes of competency-based training are sound, its actual application and the definitions that support it have failed to address the real needs of individuals and teams working in complex work environments.
Publication Type: Thesis Doctoral
Rights Statement: Copyright 2005 - Phillip David Rutherford
HERDC Category Description: T2 Thesis - Doctorate by Research
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 128
Views: 127
Downloads: 29
Appears in Collections:Thesis Doctoral

Files in This Item:
7 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE03.pdfAbstract589.06 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfThesis18.74 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

112
checked on Feb 8, 2019

Download(s)

44
checked on Feb 8, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.