Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/257
Title: Appliances and their impact: the ownership of domestic technology and time spent on household work
Contributor(s): Bittman, M (author); Rice, JM (author); Wajcman, J (author)
Publication Date: 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00026.x
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/257
Abstract: Ever since the appearance of Vanek’s pioneering article in 1974, there has been a controversy about whether ‘labour saving’ domestic appliances actually save labour time. Vanek argued that time spent in housework had barely changed since 1926, despite the diffusion of practically every known domestic appliance over this period. Gershuny and Robinson challenge Vanek’s ‘constancy of housework’ thesis, arguing that, between 1965 and 1985, domestic technology has significantly reduced the weekly hours of women’s routine housework. Although there is much talking past each other, none of the protagonists in this dispute have any direct data about which households own or do not own domestic appliances. Instead, they all rely on the passage of the years as a proxy for ownership of domesticappliances, since a higher proportion of contemporary households now own domestic appliances. The Australian 1997 Time Use Survey (Australian Bureau of Statistics 1998b) is rare among official surveys, as it simultaneously provides detailed information on time spent in housework and an inventory of household appliances. The analysis of this data show that domestic technology rarely reduceswomen’s unpaid working time and even, paradoxically, produces some increases in domestic labour. The domestic division of labour by gender remains remarkably resistant to technological innovation.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: The British Journal of Sociology, 55(3), p. 401-423
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Place of Publication: Oxford
ISSN: 0007-1315
Field of Research (FOR): 160899 Sociology not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 139
Views: 139
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

47
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

40
checked on Dec 29, 2018
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.