Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The Debate that Had to Happen But Never Did: The Changing Role of Australian Local Government||Contributor(s):||Dollery, Brian Edward (author); Wallis, Joe (author); Allan, Percy (author)||Publication Date:||2006||DOI:||10.1080/10361140600959775||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3159||Abstract:||The past few decades have witnessed a significant transformation in the composition of Australian local government service provision away from its traditional narrow emphasis on 'services to property' towards a broader 'services to people' approach. This process has occurred by default in an ad hoc incremental manner with virtually no debate on the changing role of local councils, unlike the New Zealand experience where a similar transition in service delivery generated public debate. In an effort to stimulate a 'debate that had to happen but never did', this paper seeks to establish whether a significant shift in the service mix of Australian municipalities has indeed taken place and then evaluates three stylized models of local government that could be adopted in Australia: minimalist councils; optimalist councils; and maximalist councils.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Australian Journal of Political Science, 41(4), p. 553-567||Publisher:||Routledge||Place of Publication:||Abingdon (Oxon), UK||ISSN:||1036-1146||Field of Research (FOR):||140213 Public Economics- Public Choice||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 414
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
checked on Nov 30, 2018
checked on Jan 3, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.