Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Street-life in Constantinople: Women and the Carnivalesque||Contributor(s):||Garland, L (author)||Publication Date:||2006||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/359||Abstract:||The existence of humour in Byzantium still appears surprising to the modern scholarly mind. Humour - a phenomenon which can include a variety of behaviour intended to produce smiles of laughter in an audience or readership - is the ultimate unorthodoxy, with its implications of mockery, lack of respect or restraint, reversal of roles, and evasion of social and/or political control. This is especially the case as so much Byzantine humour, like its classical predecessors, was based on mockery, abuse and humiliation - subjects like defecation, obscenity, physical violence, ritual humiliation, insults, and heavy sexual innuendo are rampant in the twelfth century, if not earlier (Garland 1990b; 1999b; Haldon 2002a, 2002b). To the Byzantines themselves, laughter was generally considered not only vulgar, but licentious and impious: just as Jesus, in the Gospel tradition, is never recorded as indulging in laughter, so saints, for example, are rarely if ever described as laughing - though they occasionally indulge in a smile which characterises their apatheia, their lack of concern with humanity's passions and desires.||Publication Type:||Book Chapter||Source of Publication:||Byzantine Women: Varieties of Experience 800-1200, p. 163-176||Publisher:||Ashgate Publishing Limited||Place of Publication:||Great Britain||ISBN:||9780754657378||Field of Research (FOR):||210306 Classical Greek and Roman History||HERDC Category Description:||B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book||Other Links:||http://books.google.com.au/books?id=T4eMlP3nV4YC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA163||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 96
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapter|
Files in This Item:
checked on Feb 8, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.