Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/402
Title: Critical thinking disposition of Hong Kong Chinese and Australian nursing students
Contributor(s): Tiwari, A (author); Avery, AJ (author); Lai, P (author)
Publication Date: 2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02805.x
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/402
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Critical thinking is frequently cited as a desirable professional attribute and a highly valued educational outcome. Despite the abundance of literature on the subject, validation of the critical thinking construct in different cultural populations is under-researched.AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the critical thinking dispositions of Hong Kong Chinese and Australian nursing students.DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was used with two groups of nursing students in two universities, one in Hong Kong and the other in Australia. Critical thinking disposition was measured using the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI).RESULTS: Significant differences were detected in critical thinking disposition between the two groups of students (P < 0·05), with the Hong Kong Chinese students failing to show a positive disposition toward critical thinking on the CCTDI total mean score, while the Australian students showed a positive disposition. Similarities and differences were also noted between the groups in CCTDI subscale mean scores.CONCLUSION: The findings contribute to knowledge of critical thinking by demonstrating differences and similarities between Hong Kong Chinese and Australian nursing students. The study raises questions about the effects of institutional, educational, professional and cultural factors on the disposition to think critically.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(3), p. 298-307
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Place of Publication: USA
ISSN: 0309-2402
Field of Research (FOR): 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 195
Views: 198
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

56
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.