Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://une.intersearch.com.au/unejspui/handle/1959.11/676
Title: An Empirical Approach to Legal Rights for Animals: Some Pluses, More Minuses
Contributor(s): Fox, MA (author)
Publication Date: 2004
DOI: 10.1163/1568530043068056
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/676
Abstract: The literature on animal rights and related issues is burgeoning. If one were seeking a candidate for the "understatement of the year award", this proposition certainly would look like a winner. One must be forgiven the inclination to think that whatever is sayable on these topics already has been said—indeed, many times over. Isthere anything new under the sun? Well, yes: What is relatively new, at least, is the use of empirical data to support a higher level of ethical consideration and a more significant legal status for nonhuman animals. DeGrazia (1996) first devoted a full-lengthstudy to how science may be applied to ethical theorizing about animals. In like manner, Wise's (2002) work brings science more forcefully to bear on legal theorizing about animals.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Society and Animals: journal of human-animal studies, 12(4), p. 341-348
Publisher: Brill Academic Publishers
Place of Publication: The Netherlands & USA
ISSN: 1063-1119
Field of Research (FOR): 220399 Philosophy not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Other Links: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=18&pid=9005
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 75
Views: 74
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.