Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Labour Market Deregulation and the Orientation of Macroeconomic Policy||Contributor(s):||Smith, GO (author)||Publication Date:||2003||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/684||Abstract:||Labour market deregulation in Australia can be traced back to the secondtier decision of 1987 and was massively confirmed by the Coalition's WorkplaceRelations Act of 1996. The emphasis is upon agreement-making with a view toachieving flexible working arrangements. Among the outcomes are dispersion inhours worked and in pay. This transformation of the labour market has taken place ina predominant regime of macroeconomic stringency. This is true of LaborGovernments since 1987 but is especially true of the Coalition since 1996. Theorientation of budget policy has been to the achievement of a surplus and residualunemployment has been explained by structural features of the labour market. Thereis debate about the workings of the macroeconomy. But there are also differentinterests represented by the different priorities on the containment of inflation asagainst the pursuit of full employment. In this paper the discussion of incomespolicies is revisited, with a view to finding some extra degrees of freedom formacroeconomic expansion. The early Accord (1983-86) was a particular kind ofincomes policy, focused on the national wage-productivity relation. The share ofwages vis-8-vis profits was diminished by the Accord arrangements with importantimplications. Subsequent deregulated arrangements have confirmed the diminishedwage share in national income. There are issues here for any incomes policy thatmight be thought of. As well as movements in the functional distribution of income,the size distribution of income (across households) has become more dispersed. Thepaper addresses issues to do with relativities in pay and looks for ways of finding aconsensus that might lessen the prospect of competitive pay pressure in the face ofmacroeconomic expansion. The overall share of wages vis-8-vis profits could also besubject to assessment as a follow on from discussion of pay relativities. For theworkforce this would be a potentially empowering exercise, as opposed to beingkept on the back foot in decentralised bargaining settings by the application ofstringent macroeconomic policies.||Publication Type:||Conference Publication||Conference Name:||5th Path to Full Employment and the 10th National Conference on Unemployment, University of Newcastle, Dec 10-12, 2003||Conference Details:||5th Path to Full Employment and the 10th National Conference on Unemployment, University of Newcastle, Dec 10-12, 2003||Source of Publication:||'The Full Employment Imperative': Proceedings of the 5th Path to Full Employment Conference/10th National Conference on Unemployment, p. 235-241||Publisher:||Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CoFEE), University of Newcastle||Place of Publication:||Newcastle, Australia||Field of Research (FOR):||140209 Industry Economics and Industrial Organisation||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||E1 Refereed Scholarly Conference Publication||Other Links:||http://e1.newcastle.edu.au/coffee/conferences/2003/index.cfm
|Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 172
|Appears in Collections:||Conference Publication|
Files in This Item:
checked on Feb 8, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.